operator s feet Search Results


97
Med Associates Inc operant conditioning chambers
SynGAP reduction leads to increased lever pressing and altered goal-directed responding in an operant <t>conditioning</t> task. a , Schematic and timeline of the random ratio operant conditioning task. b–d , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ (WT, n = 15) and Syngap1 +/lx-st (Het, n = 13) mice. b , Number of lever presses per minute across sessions (mean ± SEM). CRF, continuous reinforcement schedule; RR, random ratio schedule. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA: day × genotype p < 0.0001, F (8,208) = 5.814; day p < 0.0001, F (1.896,49.30) = 92.69; genotype p = 0.0036, F (1,26) = 10.24; subject p < 0.0001, F (26,208) = 5.680. c , Number of lever presses on the devalued versus valued session for each mouse. Bars represent the mean. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test: WT devalued versus valued, p = 0.0002; Het devalued versus valued, p = 0.0942. d , Devaluation index (mean ± SEM, dots represent values for individual mice). Two-tailed Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.0796, U = 59. e–g , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ ;Drd1-Cre + or Syngap1 +/+ or fl/+ or fl/fl ;Drd1-Cre − (WT, n = 12) and Syngap1 fl/+ ;Drd1-Cre + (Het, n = 17) mice. e , Number of lever presses per minute across sessions (mean ± SEM). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA: day × genotype p = 0.0660, F (8,216) = 1.870; day p < 0.0001, F (2.065,55.76) = 76.77; genotype p = 0.1332, F (1,27) = 2.397; subject p < 0.0001, F (27,216) = 6.007. f , Number of lever presses on the devalued versus valued session for each mouse. Bars represent the mean. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test: WT devalued versus valued, p = 0.0010; Het devalued versus valued, p = 0.0241. g , Devaluation index (mean ± SEM, dots represent values for individual mice). Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.2405, U = 75. h–j , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ ;Adora2a-Cre + or Syngap1 +/+ or fl/+ or fl/fl ;Adora2a-Cre − (WT, n = 10) and Syngap1 fl/+ ;Adora2a-Cre + (Het, n = 11) mice. h , Number of lever presses per minute across sessions (mean ± SEM). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA: day × genotype p = 0.0012, F (8,152) = 3.432; day p < 0.0001, F (2.304,43.77) = 51.94; genotype p = 0.0556, F (1,19) = 4.157; subject p < 0.0001, F (19,152) = 7.531. i , Number of lever presses on the devalued versus valued session for each mouse. Bars represent the mean. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test: WT devalued versus valued, p = 0.0020; Het devalued versus valued, p = 0.0723. j , Devaluation index (mean ± SEM, dots represent values for individual mice). Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.0101, U = 19.
Operant Conditioning Chambers, supplied by Med Associates Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/operator+s+feet/pmc11604145-103-14-17?v=Med+Associates+Inc
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
operant conditioning chambers - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Malvern Panalytical zero point charge zpc
SynGAP reduction leads to increased lever pressing and altered goal-directed responding in an operant <t>conditioning</t> task. a , Schematic and timeline of the random ratio operant conditioning task. b–d , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ (WT, n = 15) and Syngap1 +/lx-st (Het, n = 13) mice. b , Number of lever presses per minute across sessions (mean ± SEM). CRF, continuous reinforcement schedule; RR, random ratio schedule. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA: day × genotype p < 0.0001, F (8,208) = 5.814; day p < 0.0001, F (1.896,49.30) = 92.69; genotype p = 0.0036, F (1,26) = 10.24; subject p < 0.0001, F (26,208) = 5.680. c , Number of lever presses on the devalued versus valued session for each mouse. Bars represent the mean. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test: WT devalued versus valued, p = 0.0002; Het devalued versus valued, p = 0.0942. d , Devaluation index (mean ± SEM, dots represent values for individual mice). Two-tailed Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.0796, U = 59. e–g , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ ;Drd1-Cre + or Syngap1 +/+ or fl/+ or fl/fl ;Drd1-Cre − (WT, n = 12) and Syngap1 fl/+ ;Drd1-Cre + (Het, n = 17) mice. e , Number of lever presses per minute across sessions (mean ± SEM). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA: day × genotype p = 0.0660, F (8,216) = 1.870; day p < 0.0001, F (2.065,55.76) = 76.77; genotype p = 0.1332, F (1,27) = 2.397; subject p < 0.0001, F (27,216) = 6.007. f , Number of lever presses on the devalued versus valued session for each mouse. Bars represent the mean. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test: WT devalued versus valued, p = 0.0010; Het devalued versus valued, p = 0.0241. g , Devaluation index (mean ± SEM, dots represent values for individual mice). Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.2405, U = 75. h–j , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ ;Adora2a-Cre + or Syngap1 +/+ or fl/+ or fl/fl ;Adora2a-Cre − (WT, n = 10) and Syngap1 fl/+ ;Adora2a-Cre + (Het, n = 11) mice. h , Number of lever presses per minute across sessions (mean ± SEM). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA: day × genotype p = 0.0012, F (8,152) = 3.432; day p < 0.0001, F (2.304,43.77) = 51.94; genotype p = 0.0556, F (1,19) = 4.157; subject p < 0.0001, F (19,152) = 7.531. i , Number of lever presses on the devalued versus valued session for each mouse. Bars represent the mean. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test: WT devalued versus valued, p = 0.0020; Het devalued versus valued, p = 0.0723. j , Devaluation index (mean ± SEM, dots represent values for individual mice). Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.0101, U = 19.
Zero Point Charge Zpc, supplied by Malvern Panalytical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/operator+s+feet/pm37999319-102-8-19?v=Malvern+Panalytical
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
zero point charge zpc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Murray Goulburn Co Operative Co Limited rivers murray goulburn campaspe
SynGAP reduction leads to increased lever pressing and altered goal-directed responding in an operant <t>conditioning</t> task. a , Schematic and timeline of the random ratio operant conditioning task. b–d , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ (WT, n = 15) and Syngap1 +/lx-st (Het, n = 13) mice. b , Number of lever presses per minute across sessions (mean ± SEM). CRF, continuous reinforcement schedule; RR, random ratio schedule. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA: day × genotype p < 0.0001, F (8,208) = 5.814; day p < 0.0001, F (1.896,49.30) = 92.69; genotype p = 0.0036, F (1,26) = 10.24; subject p < 0.0001, F (26,208) = 5.680. c , Number of lever presses on the devalued versus valued session for each mouse. Bars represent the mean. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test: WT devalued versus valued, p = 0.0002; Het devalued versus valued, p = 0.0942. d , Devaluation index (mean ± SEM, dots represent values for individual mice). Two-tailed Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.0796, U = 59. e–g , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ ;Drd1-Cre + or Syngap1 +/+ or fl/+ or fl/fl ;Drd1-Cre − (WT, n = 12) and Syngap1 fl/+ ;Drd1-Cre + (Het, n = 17) mice. e , Number of lever presses per minute across sessions (mean ± SEM). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA: day × genotype p = 0.0660, F (8,216) = 1.870; day p < 0.0001, F (2.065,55.76) = 76.77; genotype p = 0.1332, F (1,27) = 2.397; subject p < 0.0001, F (27,216) = 6.007. f , Number of lever presses on the devalued versus valued session for each mouse. Bars represent the mean. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test: WT devalued versus valued, p = 0.0010; Het devalued versus valued, p = 0.0241. g , Devaluation index (mean ± SEM, dots represent values for individual mice). Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.2405, U = 75. h–j , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ ;Adora2a-Cre + or Syngap1 +/+ or fl/+ or fl/fl ;Adora2a-Cre − (WT, n = 10) and Syngap1 fl/+ ;Adora2a-Cre + (Het, n = 11) mice. h , Number of lever presses per minute across sessions (mean ± SEM). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA: day × genotype p = 0.0012, F (8,152) = 3.432; day p < 0.0001, F (2.304,43.77) = 51.94; genotype p = 0.0556, F (1,19) = 4.157; subject p < 0.0001, F (19,152) = 7.531. i , Number of lever presses on the devalued versus valued session for each mouse. Bars represent the mean. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test: WT devalued versus valued, p = 0.0020; Het devalued versus valued, p = 0.0723. j , Devaluation index (mean ± SEM, dots represent values for individual mice). Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.0101, U = 19.
Rivers Murray Goulburn Campaspe, supplied by Murray Goulburn Co Operative Co Limited, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/operator+s+feet/pmc10786729__267_2023_1900_MOESM2_ESM-20-5-6?v=Murray+Goulburn+Co+Operative+Co+Limited
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rivers murray goulburn campaspe - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Genovis Inc electronic charge density operator 139 a 1 1
SynGAP reduction leads to increased lever pressing and altered goal-directed responding in an operant <t>conditioning</t> task. a , Schematic and timeline of the random ratio operant conditioning task. b–d , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ (WT, n = 15) and Syngap1 +/lx-st (Het, n = 13) mice. b , Number of lever presses per minute across sessions (mean ± SEM). CRF, continuous reinforcement schedule; RR, random ratio schedule. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA: day × genotype p < 0.0001, F (8,208) = 5.814; day p < 0.0001, F (1.896,49.30) = 92.69; genotype p = 0.0036, F (1,26) = 10.24; subject p < 0.0001, F (26,208) = 5.680. c , Number of lever presses on the devalued versus valued session for each mouse. Bars represent the mean. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test: WT devalued versus valued, p = 0.0002; Het devalued versus valued, p = 0.0942. d , Devaluation index (mean ± SEM, dots represent values for individual mice). Two-tailed Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.0796, U = 59. e–g , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ ;Drd1-Cre + or Syngap1 +/+ or fl/+ or fl/fl ;Drd1-Cre − (WT, n = 12) and Syngap1 fl/+ ;Drd1-Cre + (Het, n = 17) mice. e , Number of lever presses per minute across sessions (mean ± SEM). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA: day × genotype p = 0.0660, F (8,216) = 1.870; day p < 0.0001, F (2.065,55.76) = 76.77; genotype p = 0.1332, F (1,27) = 2.397; subject p < 0.0001, F (27,216) = 6.007. f , Number of lever presses on the devalued versus valued session for each mouse. Bars represent the mean. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test: WT devalued versus valued, p = 0.0010; Het devalued versus valued, p = 0.0241. g , Devaluation index (mean ± SEM, dots represent values for individual mice). Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.2405, U = 75. h–j , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ ;Adora2a-Cre + or Syngap1 +/+ or fl/+ or fl/fl ;Adora2a-Cre − (WT, n = 10) and Syngap1 fl/+ ;Adora2a-Cre + (Het, n = 11) mice. h , Number of lever presses per minute across sessions (mean ± SEM). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA: day × genotype p = 0.0012, F (8,152) = 3.432; day p < 0.0001, F (2.304,43.77) = 51.94; genotype p = 0.0556, F (1,19) = 4.157; subject p < 0.0001, F (19,152) = 7.531. i , Number of lever presses on the devalued versus valued session for each mouse. Bars represent the mean. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test: WT devalued versus valued, p = 0.0020; Het devalued versus valued, p = 0.0723. j , Devaluation index (mean ± SEM, dots represent values for individual mice). Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.0101, U = 19.
Electronic Charge Density Operator 139 A 1 1, supplied by Genovis Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/operator+s+feet/bennett_kochise__2017__quantum_field_effects_in_ultrafast_nonlinear_x_ray_and_optical_spectroscopy_of_molecules-20-2-5?v=Genovis+Inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
electronic charge density operator 139 a 1 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Fonterra Co operative Group Limited fonterra co-operative
SynGAP reduction leads to increased lever pressing and altered goal-directed responding in an operant <t>conditioning</t> task. a , Schematic and timeline of the random ratio operant conditioning task. b–d , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ (WT, n = 15) and Syngap1 +/lx-st (Het, n = 13) mice. b , Number of lever presses per minute across sessions (mean ± SEM). CRF, continuous reinforcement schedule; RR, random ratio schedule. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA: day × genotype p < 0.0001, F (8,208) = 5.814; day p < 0.0001, F (1.896,49.30) = 92.69; genotype p = 0.0036, F (1,26) = 10.24; subject p < 0.0001, F (26,208) = 5.680. c , Number of lever presses on the devalued versus valued session for each mouse. Bars represent the mean. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test: WT devalued versus valued, p = 0.0002; Het devalued versus valued, p = 0.0942. d , Devaluation index (mean ± SEM, dots represent values for individual mice). Two-tailed Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.0796, U = 59. e–g , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ ;Drd1-Cre + or Syngap1 +/+ or fl/+ or fl/fl ;Drd1-Cre − (WT, n = 12) and Syngap1 fl/+ ;Drd1-Cre + (Het, n = 17) mice. e , Number of lever presses per minute across sessions (mean ± SEM). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA: day × genotype p = 0.0660, F (8,216) = 1.870; day p < 0.0001, F (2.065,55.76) = 76.77; genotype p = 0.1332, F (1,27) = 2.397; subject p < 0.0001, F (27,216) = 6.007. f , Number of lever presses on the devalued versus valued session for each mouse. Bars represent the mean. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test: WT devalued versus valued, p = 0.0010; Het devalued versus valued, p = 0.0241. g , Devaluation index (mean ± SEM, dots represent values for individual mice). Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.2405, U = 75. h–j , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ ;Adora2a-Cre + or Syngap1 +/+ or fl/+ or fl/fl ;Adora2a-Cre − (WT, n = 10) and Syngap1 fl/+ ;Adora2a-Cre + (Het, n = 11) mice. h , Number of lever presses per minute across sessions (mean ± SEM). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA: day × genotype p = 0.0012, F (8,152) = 3.432; day p < 0.0001, F (2.304,43.77) = 51.94; genotype p = 0.0556, F (1,19) = 4.157; subject p < 0.0001, F (19,152) = 7.531. i , Number of lever presses on the devalued versus valued session for each mouse. Bars represent the mean. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test: WT devalued versus valued, p = 0.0020; Het devalued versus valued, p = 0.0723. j , Devaluation index (mean ± SEM, dots represent values for individual mice). Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.0101, U = 19.
Fonterra Co Operative, supplied by Fonterra Co operative Group Limited, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/operator+s+feet/pm35400497-183-48-14?v=Fonterra+Co+operative+Group+Limited
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fonterra co-operative - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Oxford Instruments charge coupled device ccd camera
The numbering of the components shown in this figure follows the order described in Subheading 2.1. (a1) Photo of the BLT system; the blue dash box layouts the light-tight enclosure and the yellow dash box shows the imaging chamber as the front part of the light-tight enclosure. (a2) is a schematic of the optical assembly, mouse bed, and 1D linear stage; the optical assembly can be docked to the mouse bed by the 1D linear stage. The optical path from the imaging plane through the 3-mirror system and selected filter to the front surface of the lens (red dash line) is 45 cm. (a3) A schematic of the configuration inside imaging chamber (yellow dash box in a1), including the layout of thermostatic system, the position of 4 LEDs, and 7 fans; (b1-2) are the photo and the detailed drawing of the mouse bed. The bed is transportable and compatible for both BLT system and SARRP. Label: (1) transportable mouse bed, (1-1) frame, (1-2) central circular plate, (1-3) nose cone, (1-4) anesthesia hose, (1-5) BBs; (2) mouse bed support; (3) light-tight enclosure (blue dash box in a1), (3-1) imaging chamber (yellow dash box in a1); (4) <t>CCD</t> camera; (5) lens; (6) filter wheel; (7) 3-mirror system; (8) rotary stage; (9) LED; (10) resistor; (11) thermocouple; (12) thermocouple monitor; (13) fan; (14) heat gun; (15) 1D linear stage; (16) computer console; (17) mobile cart
Charge Coupled Device Ccd Camera, supplied by Oxford Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/operator+s+feet/pmc09098109-85-0-7?v=Oxford+Instruments
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
charge coupled device ccd camera - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Linemaster Switch foot operated switch
The numbering of the components shown in this figure follows the order described in Subheading 2.1. (a1) Photo of the BLT system; the blue dash box layouts the light-tight enclosure and the yellow dash box shows the imaging chamber as the front part of the light-tight enclosure. (a2) is a schematic of the optical assembly, mouse bed, and 1D linear stage; the optical assembly can be docked to the mouse bed by the 1D linear stage. The optical path from the imaging plane through the 3-mirror system and selected filter to the front surface of the lens (red dash line) is 45 cm. (a3) A schematic of the configuration inside imaging chamber (yellow dash box in a1), including the layout of thermostatic system, the position of 4 LEDs, and 7 fans; (b1-2) are the photo and the detailed drawing of the mouse bed. The bed is transportable and compatible for both BLT system and SARRP. Label: (1) transportable mouse bed, (1-1) frame, (1-2) central circular plate, (1-3) nose cone, (1-4) anesthesia hose, (1-5) BBs; (2) mouse bed support; (3) light-tight enclosure (blue dash box in a1), (3-1) imaging chamber (yellow dash box in a1); (4) <t>CCD</t> camera; (5) lens; (6) filter wheel; (7) 3-mirror system; (8) rotary stage; (9) LED; (10) resistor; (11) thermocouple; (12) thermocouple monitor; (13) fan; (14) heat gun; (15) 1D linear stage; (16) computer console; (17) mobile cart
Foot Operated Switch, supplied by Linemaster Switch, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/operator+s+feet/pmc06714056-460-108-113?v=Linemaster+Switch
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
foot operated switch - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Malvern Panalytical zero charge phpzc
The numbering of the components shown in this figure follows the order described in Subheading 2.1. (a1) Photo of the BLT system; the blue dash box layouts the light-tight enclosure and the yellow dash box shows the imaging chamber as the front part of the light-tight enclosure. (a2) is a schematic of the optical assembly, mouse bed, and 1D linear stage; the optical assembly can be docked to the mouse bed by the 1D linear stage. The optical path from the imaging plane through the 3-mirror system and selected filter to the front surface of the lens (red dash line) is 45 cm. (a3) A schematic of the configuration inside imaging chamber (yellow dash box in a1), including the layout of thermostatic system, the position of 4 LEDs, and 7 fans; (b1-2) are the photo and the detailed drawing of the mouse bed. The bed is transportable and compatible for both BLT system and SARRP. Label: (1) transportable mouse bed, (1-1) frame, (1-2) central circular plate, (1-3) nose cone, (1-4) anesthesia hose, (1-5) BBs; (2) mouse bed support; (3) light-tight enclosure (blue dash box in a1), (3-1) imaging chamber (yellow dash box in a1); (4) <t>CCD</t> camera; (5) lens; (6) filter wheel; (7) 3-mirror system; (8) rotary stage; (9) LED; (10) resistor; (11) thermocouple; (12) thermocouple monitor; (13) fan; (14) heat gun; (15) 1D linear stage; (16) computer console; (17) mobile cart
Zero Charge Phpzc, supplied by Malvern Panalytical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/operator+s+feet/10__3390_slash_app15031052-70-8-14?v=Malvern+Panalytical
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
zero charge phpzc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SoftBank Robotics pepper robot
The numbering of the components shown in this figure follows the order described in Subheading 2.1. (a1) Photo of the BLT system; the blue dash box layouts the light-tight enclosure and the yellow dash box shows the imaging chamber as the front part of the light-tight enclosure. (a2) is a schematic of the optical assembly, mouse bed, and 1D linear stage; the optical assembly can be docked to the mouse bed by the 1D linear stage. The optical path from the imaging plane through the 3-mirror system and selected filter to the front surface of the lens (red dash line) is 45 cm. (a3) A schematic of the configuration inside imaging chamber (yellow dash box in a1), including the layout of thermostatic system, the position of 4 LEDs, and 7 fans; (b1-2) are the photo and the detailed drawing of the mouse bed. The bed is transportable and compatible for both BLT system and SARRP. Label: (1) transportable mouse bed, (1-1) frame, (1-2) central circular plate, (1-3) nose cone, (1-4) anesthesia hose, (1-5) BBs; (2) mouse bed support; (3) light-tight enclosure (blue dash box in a1), (3-1) imaging chamber (yellow dash box in a1); (4) <t>CCD</t> camera; (5) lens; (6) filter wheel; (7) 3-mirror system; (8) rotary stage; (9) LED; (10) resistor; (11) thermocouple; (12) thermocouple monitor; (13) fan; (14) heat gun; (15) 1D linear stage; (16) computer console; (17) mobile cart
Pepper Robot, supplied by SoftBank Robotics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/operator+s+feet/10__1111_slash_jpim__12726-31-2-33?v=SoftBank+Robotics
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pepper robot - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
VisEn Medical operational transconductance amplifier 192
The numbering of the components shown in this figure follows the order described in Subheading 2.1. (a1) Photo of the BLT system; the blue dash box layouts the light-tight enclosure and the yellow dash box shows the imaging chamber as the front part of the light-tight enclosure. (a2) is a schematic of the optical assembly, mouse bed, and 1D linear stage; the optical assembly can be docked to the mouse bed by the 1D linear stage. The optical path from the imaging plane through the 3-mirror system and selected filter to the front surface of the lens (red dash line) is 45 cm. (a3) A schematic of the configuration inside imaging chamber (yellow dash box in a1), including the layout of thermostatic system, the position of 4 LEDs, and 7 fans; (b1-2) are the photo and the detailed drawing of the mouse bed. The bed is transportable and compatible for both BLT system and SARRP. Label: (1) transportable mouse bed, (1-1) frame, (1-2) central circular plate, (1-3) nose cone, (1-4) anesthesia hose, (1-5) BBs; (2) mouse bed support; (3) light-tight enclosure (blue dash box in a1), (3-1) imaging chamber (yellow dash box in a1); (4) <t>CCD</t> camera; (5) lens; (6) filter wheel; (7) 3-mirror system; (8) rotary stage; (9) LED; (10) resistor; (11) thermocouple; (12) thermocouple monitor; (13) fan; (14) heat gun; (15) 1D linear stage; (16) computer console; (17) mobile cart
Operational Transconductance Amplifier 192, supplied by VisEn Medical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/operator+s+feet/us10171003-181-1-21?v=VisEn+Medical
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
operational transconductance amplifier 192 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Stryker stryker neurovascular
The numbering of the components shown in this figure follows the order described in Subheading 2.1. (a1) Photo of the BLT system; the blue dash box layouts the light-tight enclosure and the yellow dash box shows the imaging chamber as the front part of the light-tight enclosure. (a2) is a schematic of the optical assembly, mouse bed, and 1D linear stage; the optical assembly can be docked to the mouse bed by the 1D linear stage. The optical path from the imaging plane through the 3-mirror system and selected filter to the front surface of the lens (red dash line) is 45 cm. (a3) A schematic of the configuration inside imaging chamber (yellow dash box in a1), including the layout of thermostatic system, the position of 4 LEDs, and 7 fans; (b1-2) are the photo and the detailed drawing of the mouse bed. The bed is transportable and compatible for both BLT system and SARRP. Label: (1) transportable mouse bed, (1-1) frame, (1-2) central circular plate, (1-3) nose cone, (1-4) anesthesia hose, (1-5) BBs; (2) mouse bed support; (3) light-tight enclosure (blue dash box in a1), (3-1) imaging chamber (yellow dash box in a1); (4) <t>CCD</t> camera; (5) lens; (6) filter wheel; (7) 3-mirror system; (8) rotary stage; (9) LED; (10) resistor; (11) thermocouple; (12) thermocouple monitor; (13) fan; (14) heat gun; (15) 1D linear stage; (16) computer console; (17) mobile cart
Stryker Neurovascular, supplied by Stryker, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/operator+s+feet/pmc12778490-232-52-52?v=Stryker
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
stryker neurovascular - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
BIOSEB Inc dark five-choice operant chambers
The numbering of the components shown in this figure follows the order described in Subheading 2.1. (a1) Photo of the BLT system; the blue dash box layouts the light-tight enclosure and the yellow dash box shows the imaging chamber as the front part of the light-tight enclosure. (a2) is a schematic of the optical assembly, mouse bed, and 1D linear stage; the optical assembly can be docked to the mouse bed by the 1D linear stage. The optical path from the imaging plane through the 3-mirror system and selected filter to the front surface of the lens (red dash line) is 45 cm. (a3) A schematic of the configuration inside imaging chamber (yellow dash box in a1), including the layout of thermostatic system, the position of 4 LEDs, and 7 fans; (b1-2) are the photo and the detailed drawing of the mouse bed. The bed is transportable and compatible for both BLT system and SARRP. Label: (1) transportable mouse bed, (1-1) frame, (1-2) central circular plate, (1-3) nose cone, (1-4) anesthesia hose, (1-5) BBs; (2) mouse bed support; (3) light-tight enclosure (blue dash box in a1), (3-1) imaging chamber (yellow dash box in a1); (4) <t>CCD</t> camera; (5) lens; (6) filter wheel; (7) 3-mirror system; (8) rotary stage; (9) LED; (10) resistor; (11) thermocouple; (12) thermocouple monitor; (13) fan; (14) heat gun; (15) 1D linear stage; (16) computer console; (17) mobile cart
Dark Five Choice Operant Chambers, supplied by BIOSEB Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/operator+s+feet/10__1017_slash_s1461145714000972-41-2-13?v=BIOSEB+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dark five-choice operant chambers - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


SynGAP reduction leads to increased lever pressing and altered goal-directed responding in an operant conditioning task. a , Schematic and timeline of the random ratio operant conditioning task. b–d , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ (WT, n = 15) and Syngap1 +/lx-st (Het, n = 13) mice. b , Number of lever presses per minute across sessions (mean ± SEM). CRF, continuous reinforcement schedule; RR, random ratio schedule. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA: day × genotype p < 0.0001, F (8,208) = 5.814; day p < 0.0001, F (1.896,49.30) = 92.69; genotype p = 0.0036, F (1,26) = 10.24; subject p < 0.0001, F (26,208) = 5.680. c , Number of lever presses on the devalued versus valued session for each mouse. Bars represent the mean. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test: WT devalued versus valued, p = 0.0002; Het devalued versus valued, p = 0.0942. d , Devaluation index (mean ± SEM, dots represent values for individual mice). Two-tailed Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.0796, U = 59. e–g , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ ;Drd1-Cre + or Syngap1 +/+ or fl/+ or fl/fl ;Drd1-Cre − (WT, n = 12) and Syngap1 fl/+ ;Drd1-Cre + (Het, n = 17) mice. e , Number of lever presses per minute across sessions (mean ± SEM). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA: day × genotype p = 0.0660, F (8,216) = 1.870; day p < 0.0001, F (2.065,55.76) = 76.77; genotype p = 0.1332, F (1,27) = 2.397; subject p < 0.0001, F (27,216) = 6.007. f , Number of lever presses on the devalued versus valued session for each mouse. Bars represent the mean. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test: WT devalued versus valued, p = 0.0010; Het devalued versus valued, p = 0.0241. g , Devaluation index (mean ± SEM, dots represent values for individual mice). Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.2405, U = 75. h–j , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ ;Adora2a-Cre + or Syngap1 +/+ or fl/+ or fl/fl ;Adora2a-Cre − (WT, n = 10) and Syngap1 fl/+ ;Adora2a-Cre + (Het, n = 11) mice. h , Number of lever presses per minute across sessions (mean ± SEM). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA: day × genotype p = 0.0012, F (8,152) = 3.432; day p < 0.0001, F (2.304,43.77) = 51.94; genotype p = 0.0556, F (1,19) = 4.157; subject p < 0.0001, F (19,152) = 7.531. i , Number of lever presses on the devalued versus valued session for each mouse. Bars represent the mean. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test: WT devalued versus valued, p = 0.0020; Het devalued versus valued, p = 0.0723. j , Devaluation index (mean ± SEM, dots represent values for individual mice). Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.0101, U = 19.

Journal: The Journal of Neuroscience

Article Title: Haploinsufficiency of Syngap1 in Striatal Indirect Pathway Neurons Alters Motor and Goal-Directed Behaviors in Mice

doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1264-23.2024

Figure Lengend Snippet: SynGAP reduction leads to increased lever pressing and altered goal-directed responding in an operant conditioning task. a , Schematic and timeline of the random ratio operant conditioning task. b–d , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ (WT, n = 15) and Syngap1 +/lx-st (Het, n = 13) mice. b , Number of lever presses per minute across sessions (mean ± SEM). CRF, continuous reinforcement schedule; RR, random ratio schedule. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA: day × genotype p < 0.0001, F (8,208) = 5.814; day p < 0.0001, F (1.896,49.30) = 92.69; genotype p = 0.0036, F (1,26) = 10.24; subject p < 0.0001, F (26,208) = 5.680. c , Number of lever presses on the devalued versus valued session for each mouse. Bars represent the mean. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test: WT devalued versus valued, p = 0.0002; Het devalued versus valued, p = 0.0942. d , Devaluation index (mean ± SEM, dots represent values for individual mice). Two-tailed Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.0796, U = 59. e–g , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ ;Drd1-Cre + or Syngap1 +/+ or fl/+ or fl/fl ;Drd1-Cre − (WT, n = 12) and Syngap1 fl/+ ;Drd1-Cre + (Het, n = 17) mice. e , Number of lever presses per minute across sessions (mean ± SEM). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA: day × genotype p = 0.0660, F (8,216) = 1.870; day p < 0.0001, F (2.065,55.76) = 76.77; genotype p = 0.1332, F (1,27) = 2.397; subject p < 0.0001, F (27,216) = 6.007. f , Number of lever presses on the devalued versus valued session for each mouse. Bars represent the mean. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test: WT devalued versus valued, p = 0.0010; Het devalued versus valued, p = 0.0241. g , Devaluation index (mean ± SEM, dots represent values for individual mice). Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.2405, U = 75. h–j , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ ;Adora2a-Cre + or Syngap1 +/+ or fl/+ or fl/fl ;Adora2a-Cre − (WT, n = 10) and Syngap1 fl/+ ;Adora2a-Cre + (Het, n = 11) mice. h , Number of lever presses per minute across sessions (mean ± SEM). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA: day × genotype p = 0.0012, F (8,152) = 3.432; day p < 0.0001, F (2.304,43.77) = 51.94; genotype p = 0.0556, F (1,19) = 4.157; subject p < 0.0001, F (19,152) = 7.531. i , Number of lever presses on the devalued versus valued session for each mouse. Bars represent the mean. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test: WT devalued versus valued, p = 0.0020; Het devalued versus valued, p = 0.0723. j , Devaluation index (mean ± SEM, dots represent values for individual mice). Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.0101, U = 19.

Article Snippet: Animals were food restricted to ∼95% of their body weight before commencing training in operant conditioning chambers (Med Associates #ENV-307A).

Techniques: Two Tailed Test, MANN-WHITNEY

Additional analysis of operant conditioning behavior. a–c , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ (WT, n = 15) and Syngap1 +/lx-st (Het, n = 13) mice. a , Lever presses per minute for the three continuous reinforcement (CRF) trials (CRF5, 15 and 30). Dots represent values for individual mice and horizontal lines represent the group median. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA p values are shown: genotype × session, p = 0.8570, F (2,52) = 0.1548; session, p = 0.7715, F (1.856,48.25) = 0.2396; genotype, p = 0.0050, F (1,26) = 9.416; subject, p = 0.3727, F (26,52) = 1.103. b , Rate of head entries across training sessions (mean ± SEM). Mixed-effects analysis: day × genotype, p = 0.0572, F (8,205) = 1.930; day, p < 0.0001, F (5.179,132,7) = 8.125; genotype, p = 0.4993, F (1,26) = 0.4695. c , Correlation between lever press rate on the fourth day of RR20 training and the devaluation index for each mouse. WT Pearson's r = 0.2645, p = 0.3408; Het Pearson's r = −0.0090, p = 0.9767. d–f , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ ;Drd1-Cre + or Syngap1 +/+ or fl/+ or fl/fl ;Drd1-Cre − (WT, n = 12) and Syngap1 fl/+ ;Drd1- Cre + (Het, n = 17) mice. d , Lever presses per minute for the CRF5, 15 and 30 trials. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA p values are shown: genotype × session, p = 0.5749, F (2,54) = 0.5593; session, p = 0.2499, F (1.253,33.82) = 1.413; genotype, p = 0.4782, F (1,27) = 0.5172; subject, p = 0.0434, F (27,54) = 1.730. e , Rate of head entries across training sessions (mean ± SEM). Repeated-measures two-way ANOVA: day × genotype, p = 0.3844, F (8,216) = 1.071; day, p = 0.0135, F (3.204,86.50) = 3.668; genotype, p = 0.8563, F (1,27) = 0.0335; subject, p < 0.0001, F (27,216) = 6.727. f , Correlation between lever press rate on the fourth day of RR20 training and the devaluation index for each mouse. dSPN WT Pearson's r = −0.1195, p = 0.7115; dSPN Het Pearson's r = −0.4602, p = 0.0630. g–i , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ ;Adora2a-Cre + or Syngap1 +/+ or fl/+ or fl/fl ;Adora2a-Cre − (WT, n = 10) and Syngap1 fl/+ ;Adora2a-Cre + (Het, n = 11) mice. g , Lever presses per minute for the CRF5, 15 and 30 trials. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA p values are shown: genotype × session, p = 0.7165, F (2,38) = 0.3363; session, p = 0.0012, F (1.298,24.67) = 11.34; genotype, p = 0.1439, F (1,19) = 2.323; subject, p = 0.0757, F (19,38) = 1.723. h , Rate of head entries across training sessions (mean ± SEM). Repeated-measures two-way ANOVA: day × genotype, p = 0.0214, F (8,152) = 2.338; day, p = 0.0129, F (3.125,59.37) = 3.844; genotype, p = 0.1001, F (1,19) = 2.989; subject, p < 0.0001, F (19,152) = 8.802. i , Correlation between lever press rate on the fourth day of RR20 training and the devaluation index for each mouse. iSPN WT Pearson's r = 0.0101, p = 0.9979; iSPN Het Pearson's r = −0.1192, p = 0.7271.

Journal: The Journal of Neuroscience

Article Title: Haploinsufficiency of Syngap1 in Striatal Indirect Pathway Neurons Alters Motor and Goal-Directed Behaviors in Mice

doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1264-23.2024

Figure Lengend Snippet: Additional analysis of operant conditioning behavior. a–c , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ (WT, n = 15) and Syngap1 +/lx-st (Het, n = 13) mice. a , Lever presses per minute for the three continuous reinforcement (CRF) trials (CRF5, 15 and 30). Dots represent values for individual mice and horizontal lines represent the group median. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA p values are shown: genotype × session, p = 0.8570, F (2,52) = 0.1548; session, p = 0.7715, F (1.856,48.25) = 0.2396; genotype, p = 0.0050, F (1,26) = 9.416; subject, p = 0.3727, F (26,52) = 1.103. b , Rate of head entries across training sessions (mean ± SEM). Mixed-effects analysis: day × genotype, p = 0.0572, F (8,205) = 1.930; day, p < 0.0001, F (5.179,132,7) = 8.125; genotype, p = 0.4993, F (1,26) = 0.4695. c , Correlation between lever press rate on the fourth day of RR20 training and the devaluation index for each mouse. WT Pearson's r = 0.2645, p = 0.3408; Het Pearson's r = −0.0090, p = 0.9767. d–f , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ ;Drd1-Cre + or Syngap1 +/+ or fl/+ or fl/fl ;Drd1-Cre − (WT, n = 12) and Syngap1 fl/+ ;Drd1- Cre + (Het, n = 17) mice. d , Lever presses per minute for the CRF5, 15 and 30 trials. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA p values are shown: genotype × session, p = 0.5749, F (2,54) = 0.5593; session, p = 0.2499, F (1.253,33.82) = 1.413; genotype, p = 0.4782, F (1,27) = 0.5172; subject, p = 0.0434, F (27,54) = 1.730. e , Rate of head entries across training sessions (mean ± SEM). Repeated-measures two-way ANOVA: day × genotype, p = 0.3844, F (8,216) = 1.071; day, p = 0.0135, F (3.204,86.50) = 3.668; genotype, p = 0.8563, F (1,27) = 0.0335; subject, p < 0.0001, F (27,216) = 6.727. f , Correlation between lever press rate on the fourth day of RR20 training and the devaluation index for each mouse. dSPN WT Pearson's r = −0.1195, p = 0.7115; dSPN Het Pearson's r = −0.4602, p = 0.0630. g–i , Operant task performance for Syngap1 +/+ ;Adora2a-Cre + or Syngap1 +/+ or fl/+ or fl/fl ;Adora2a-Cre − (WT, n = 10) and Syngap1 fl/+ ;Adora2a-Cre + (Het, n = 11) mice. g , Lever presses per minute for the CRF5, 15 and 30 trials. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA p values are shown: genotype × session, p = 0.7165, F (2,38) = 0.3363; session, p = 0.0012, F (1.298,24.67) = 11.34; genotype, p = 0.1439, F (1,19) = 2.323; subject, p = 0.0757, F (19,38) = 1.723. h , Rate of head entries across training sessions (mean ± SEM). Repeated-measures two-way ANOVA: day × genotype, p = 0.0214, F (8,152) = 2.338; day, p = 0.0129, F (3.125,59.37) = 3.844; genotype, p = 0.1001, F (1,19) = 2.989; subject, p < 0.0001, F (19,152) = 8.802. i , Correlation between lever press rate on the fourth day of RR20 training and the devaluation index for each mouse. iSPN WT Pearson's r = 0.0101, p = 0.9979; iSPN Het Pearson's r = −0.1192, p = 0.7271.

Article Snippet: Animals were food restricted to ∼95% of their body weight before commencing training in operant conditioning chambers (Med Associates #ENV-307A).

Techniques:

The numbering of the components shown in this figure follows the order described in Subheading 2.1. (a1) Photo of the BLT system; the blue dash box layouts the light-tight enclosure and the yellow dash box shows the imaging chamber as the front part of the light-tight enclosure. (a2) is a schematic of the optical assembly, mouse bed, and 1D linear stage; the optical assembly can be docked to the mouse bed by the 1D linear stage. The optical path from the imaging plane through the 3-mirror system and selected filter to the front surface of the lens (red dash line) is 45 cm. (a3) A schematic of the configuration inside imaging chamber (yellow dash box in a1), including the layout of thermostatic system, the position of 4 LEDs, and 7 fans; (b1-2) are the photo and the detailed drawing of the mouse bed. The bed is transportable and compatible for both BLT system and SARRP. Label: (1) transportable mouse bed, (1-1) frame, (1-2) central circular plate, (1-3) nose cone, (1-4) anesthesia hose, (1-5) BBs; (2) mouse bed support; (3) light-tight enclosure (blue dash box in a1), (3-1) imaging chamber (yellow dash box in a1); (4) CCD camera; (5) lens; (6) filter wheel; (7) 3-mirror system; (8) rotary stage; (9) LED; (10) resistor; (11) thermocouple; (12) thermocouple monitor; (13) fan; (14) heat gun; (15) 1D linear stage; (16) computer console; (17) mobile cart

Journal: Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)

Article Title: Quantitative Bioluminescence Tomography for In Vivo Volumetric-Guided Radiotherapy

doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1803-5_38

Figure Lengend Snippet: The numbering of the components shown in this figure follows the order described in Subheading 2.1. (a1) Photo of the BLT system; the blue dash box layouts the light-tight enclosure and the yellow dash box shows the imaging chamber as the front part of the light-tight enclosure. (a2) is a schematic of the optical assembly, mouse bed, and 1D linear stage; the optical assembly can be docked to the mouse bed by the 1D linear stage. The optical path from the imaging plane through the 3-mirror system and selected filter to the front surface of the lens (red dash line) is 45 cm. (a3) A schematic of the configuration inside imaging chamber (yellow dash box in a1), including the layout of thermostatic system, the position of 4 LEDs, and 7 fans; (b1-2) are the photo and the detailed drawing of the mouse bed. The bed is transportable and compatible for both BLT system and SARRP. Label: (1) transportable mouse bed, (1-1) frame, (1-2) central circular plate, (1-3) nose cone, (1-4) anesthesia hose, (1-5) BBs; (2) mouse bed support; (3) light-tight enclosure (blue dash box in a1), (3-1) imaging chamber (yellow dash box in a1); (4) CCD camera; (5) lens; (6) filter wheel; (7) 3-mirror system; (8) rotary stage; (9) LED; (10) resistor; (11) thermocouple; (12) thermocouple monitor; (13) fan; (14) heat gun; (15) 1D linear stage; (16) computer console; (17) mobile cart

Article Snippet: Charge coupled device (CCD) camera (iKon-L 936, Andor Technology, Belfast, UK, 27.6 mm × 27.6 mm back-illuminated sensor at 13.5-μm pixel size, operating at −80 °C) is used for image acquisition.

Techniques: Imaging